Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein: Part 3 – Friends and Fathers

WARNING! SPOILERS BELOW FOR DEL TORO’S FRANKENSTEIN!

Just go watch it on Netflix already!

This is the last post I’ll make about this movie, unless I think of something else I want to talk about. It’s a bit long, sorry. But also not sorry. Is this a special interest for me? Considering I’ve seen it enough times to know all the lines by heart and have given it enough thought to write three blog posts, maybe! :)

Adam, a man with a terribly scarred face and long hair, is in distress because his friend has just died. He says "Friend," and looks down in sorrow.
The feels. ALL the feels.

Image: Netflix

My coworker came over a while ago and watched it, since he doesn’t have Netflix. (He also made me watch Matilda, which I had never seen. I loved it.) The old man’s death got him good, and rightly so—it’s a heart-wrenching scene. A thought occurred to me later that I wanted to explore, but we haven’t had time to talk about it, so I’m sharing it with you.

Note: This discussion touches primarily on the grandfather in the movie. del Toro did not give him a name; the only family members referred to by name are the child, Anna Maria, and her mother, whose name seems to be Alma. In Mary Shelley’s novel, he’s called De Lacey, so that’s what I’ll call him here.

Question: If De Lacey, alone in the cottage for the winter, could see, would he have accepted Adam anyway?

My answer: Yes, absolutely.

After Adam (I am NOT calling him The Creature anymore) finds shelter in the mill, he secretly watches the family through the cracks in the wall. He sees them expressing their love for each other. Throughout the film, we see characters touching someone’s face or head to indicate affection for that person as well as speaking a truth—for example, when Elizabeth gently tells an amorous Victor, “Believing something does not make it true,” she touches his cheek.

Victor is looking earnestly at Elizabeth. We are standing behind her and can only see her red hair, but her hand is on his cheek.
I think she went there intending to let him down easy and he made it weird.

Image: Netflix

Similarly, when William is dying, he puts his hand on Victor’s face when he says, basically, “Bro, this is all your fault.”

Victor's brother William is at left, dying, as Victor looks at his brother in anguish. William's hand is on Victor's cheek.

Image: Netflix

Adam sees De Lacey pat his granddaughter’s head and deduces that pats or touches on the head convey sincere feelings for someone. Remember this, because it comes back full circle later.

He learns to speak by listening to them talk to each other. He tells Victor and Anderson, “These people possessed a sound—used it to tell each other about feelings and ideas. They called them words.” This is how babies pick up language, and it makes sense, since his newly animated brain is redrawing synapses. If Victor had kept him upstairs and talked to him often instead of ignoring him in the basement, it might have happened sooner.

He also learns to read when De Lacey is teaching Anna Maria. In the novel, Mary Shelley rather clumsily has Adam acquire language by listening to Felix (the son) teach his girlfriend, a runaway Arabian noblewoman, how to speak theirs (I’m not making this up, I swear). Later, Adam conveniently finds a box of books in the woods and reads them.

A brief aside on language:

The De Lacey family in the novel, as well as the Frankenstein family, speak French, so this is the language Book Adam learns. Book Victor, raised near Geneva where both German and French are official languages, has been classically educated (likely in German) and would have learned other tongues academically, including Latin, Greek, and English.

Movie Victor goes to medical school and teaches in Edinburgh (Scotland) and would speak English there. In modern-day Europe, many countries require that English be taught in schools (it’s the international language of business), and 59% of the EU population speaks at least two languages. So people from different areas being able to talk to each other is a thing that happens.

Movies made by Hollywood studios are usually in English because it is the primary language in the U.S. Foreignness is implied by giving everybody speaking English a British accent regardless of where they’re located. Frankenstein follows this practice, though the Horisont’s sailors all speak Danish with subtitles.

Judging by their location, and the cards De Lacey holds up for Anna Maria, Adam is learning in German—Vaduz, where Victor says the fictional lake and tower are located (“across the Channel”—likely meaning the English Channel), is in Lichtenstein. The Deutsche word for “boy” is junge, and the boy card has a J on it. Auge is “eye,” and the card shows an A along with the illustration.

In addition to updating the time period, del Toro kept the French connection with Victor’s mother Claire in his film adaptation. He improves on Adam’s language acquisition by mashing up the listening and the box of books into the same segment. When you adapt a work for the screen, you often must consolidate to save time. I also think this makes a lot more sense, and if Mary Shelley could see this movie, I feel like she might slap her forehead and say, “I wish I’d thought of that!”

Did you notice that the alphabet cards have small divots in the edge? De Lacey touches them to know which one he has before he asks, “What is this?” The movie is packed with these great details.

The old man with long white hair and beard holds up a round card. The edge of the card has little bites taken out of it. A blue arrow points to the bites.

Image: Netflix

Back to the discussion. De Lacey eventually figures out that someone is living in the mill gears. When Alma asks, “Who could have done this?” at the corral gate, he mutters, “The Spirit of the Forest, eh?” He obviously has figured out that whoever is helping them is the same person who is hiding in there.

I believe that his loss of sight was recent. He tells Alma and the young redheaded hunter (I’ll call him Felix), who seems to be Alma’s husband and Anna Maria’s father, that he stays alone in their cottage to pray every winter and will continue to do so. But De Lacey knows something they don’t — he’s not alone.

Now, here’s why I think he would have accepted Adam even if he could see.

When Adam comes to him, he is still wearing bandages. De Lacey can feel them along with the ridges of the scars on his face, and he rightfully understands that this man has been hurt. He knows the coat Adam wears is a soldier’s coat by the shape of the collar and cuffs and probably the texture of the fabric.

And Adam never answers his question, “Were you injured in battle?” because he doesn’t have an answer. In a country where numerous skirmishes have occurred, so many and so recent that the dead are still lying about moldering in the woods, De Lacey could assume that was the case.

Blind or not, he would come to the logical conclusion that a terribly wounded soldier suffering from memory loss has hidden in their mill and is helping them out in exchange for shelter. De Lacey was trying to atone for his own misdeeds, and so he would embrace the chance to help this poor unfortunate no matter how fearsome his appearance. He might have still asked Adam to read to him, as he was pretty advanced in years and presbyopia starts to set in around your forties or so.

And Adam is actually very non-threatening. He’s tentative and frightened. I love that when he goes in for a hug, De Lacey completely understands and just rolls with it.

The old man has his hand on Adam's head. Adam leans into him for a hug and he puts his arms around him and holds him. And now I'm gonna cry!
Poor baby NEEDED that hug!

Image: Netflix

I’m quite sure they had many discussions on numerous topics both from the books and in general—you will never convince me that Adam, whose first book ever was the Christian Bible, would fail to ask what “beget” means. So he probably learned some things about life, as well as helping De Lacey take care of himself. We don’t see them sharing meals, but I think it’s fair to assume that Alma left his food in some state of easily managed preparation.

In heartbreaking irony, I think if De Lacey had been sighted, he might not have died, because I’m convinced he didn’t close the door all the way and couldn’t see that it had swung open, thus allowing the wolves to come in.

And Adam might not have been slaughtered when Felix and the other two hunters came back, because De Lacey would have been alive and could have said, “No, no, my children! This is the Spirit of the Forest. Do not harm him, for he is my friend. He has been a great help to me this winter, and to our family.”

This is the stand-in for an angry mob. See, del Toro didn’t leave it out.

A wounded Adam stands outside under a cloudy sky near the gatehouse beyond the old man's cottage. Two hunters are advancing toward him, guns raised.
I HATE this part. 😭😭😭

Image: Netflix

I don’t think the family would have allowed Adam to stay if the grandfather had been alive, but at least he could have left them without all the trauma. But dramatically, this outcome, however much it would have soothed our broken hearts, isn’t strong enough to fuel his resentment at Victor for cheating him of Death, his only escape from a never-ending existence of pain, rejection, and loss. As sad as it was, del Toro chose to emphasize the theme of loneliness and alienation from the book; giving Adam immortality was a masterful twist on it.

I told you I’d get back to the face touching. When De Lacey is dying after the wolf attack, he lays his hand on Adam’s face and says, sounding surprised, “You came back.” Of course Adam came back; this was his friend, the one person besides Elizabeth who actually treated him like a person and not a thing. He still accepts him even after being told the truth about Adam’s origin. And we know it’s true because of the touch.

At the end, when Victor says, “Forgive me, my son,” I think Adam knew he was sincere due to his observation of touch as affection. Remember earlier in the film when baby Adam cuts his hand on the razor? Victor yells at him, “Don’t touch me! Don’t ever touch me!”

After he hears Adam’s tale, he genuinely regrets his actions. How do we know? He reaches for Adam’s hand, and then he touches his head. You can see the realization on Adam’s face; it’s all he ever wanted from his father. Jacob Elordi and Oscar Isaac both played it perfectly.

Victor at left places his hand on Adam's forehead while asking his forgiveness. At his touch, Adam closes his eyes and looks as if he is about to cry, as I always do when I watch this scene!
This killed me. I’m dead. You’re talking to a ghost.

Image: Netflix

It was not death Victor sought to conquer; it was grief.


BOOK 3:

I’ve been writing again, but it’s fanfic. The problem wasn’t my story but creative burnout. I wasn’t able to produce anything, so a hiatus seemed wise. I don’t consider the fanfic time wasted, because 1) it’s put me back in the writing habit, and 2) there is a future idea percolating inside it that might be worth exploring. I’m almost done with the fanfic, so soon I’ll be back in Ilarrya.

Guillermo del Toro’s Frankenstein: Part 2 – Yes, It’s Love, but Not How You Think

WARNING!!!! THIS POST CONTAINS SPOILERS FOR FRANKENSTEIN. PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!

Last night, a group of my colleagues and I went out, and one of them had seen Frankenstein, which meant I could wax poetic about it without spoiling. I mentioned something I alluded to in my last post, that Elizabeth’s interactions with The Creature were not romantic, but motherly. My coworker asked me to explain.

I’m going to double down on this, so stay with me. This post is an expanded version of my argument.

First, in Mary Shelley’s book, Victor and Elizabeth are the couple. William is just a child, and baby brother Ernest isn’t even in the movie at all. Elizabeth Lavenza is an Italian orphan Caroline Frankenstein plucks like a puppy from a foster home and raises with the children. Victor is basically marrying his non-related stepsister, which is somewhat less incestuous than what other noble families were doing. Making William an adult with an unrelated fiancé allows del Toro to introduce Harlander, who is so much fun we don’t care that he wasn’t in the novel.

French porcelain, anyone?

Image: via Entertainment Weekly – Ken Woroner/Netflix

Their flirtation in the film alludes to their relationship in the book. If it had been preserved in the film, Elizabeth would have been The Creature’s de facto stepmother. Watching them play with each other, you get the impression that if she weren’t already taken, Elizabeth might very well decide to accept Victor – but it would be on her own terms.

Second, del Toro’s dual casting of Mia Goth as Claire Frankenstein, Victor’s mother, and Elizabeth Harlander, is significant. I can’t remember in which article I read it, but del Toro said straight out that some men marry their mothers. Victor certainly has a fixation on his.

del Toro also uses color in his films very deliberately. The dynamics are reflected in Kate Hawley’s beautiful costume designs. Claire’s clothing is all red. Victor wears red too (gloves, a scarf, a coat). Elizabeth’s primary color is green and/or teal, but around her neck is an ever-present rosary. What color is it? Red. When she visits Victor and sees the dissection, she is wearing red, and for a moment . . . but no, sorry Victor, you weren’t the chosen one.

You want to be, but believing something doesn’t make it true.

Image: Netflix

Elizabeth’s first glimpse of The Creature is shocking. She sees a man in chains, with terrible wounds all over his body. He’s clearly different from anyone she’s ever beheld. She responds to his vulnerability and pain—her first words to him are, “Who hurt you?”  

When she returns shortly with William and Victor, it’s clear that Victor is not taking care of this child. He calls him “it” and says the chains are for his own protection and The Creature’s, because “He doesn’t know any better.” Just like a baby.

And he is, at first—scared of the sun, grabbing the razor like a curious baby, rattling the chains Victor puts on him like it’s a game, and playing with the water in the basement sluice like a baby in the bath. Victor tells Anderson, “Everything was new to him.”

On her third visit, alone this time, Elizabeth relates to him as though he’s a small child. He gives her a leaf, and she responds, “A leaf? For me? Thank you!” Her tone is that of a mother thanking a three-year-old for giving her a flower. She continues in that tone when teaching him her name.

Then, when she goes upstairs, Victor is there, lounging with his robe half open . . . looking all sensual . . . what was I saying again? Oh right!

Victor may be an ass, but broody Oscar Isaac is HOT AF.

Image: Netflix

Victor is oriented to the flesh. His research centers around the body, and he’s very grounded in sensuality and his attraction for Elizabeth. Of course the first thing this man would think is that Elizabeth is attracted to The Creature. It’s pure projection on his part. And he’s jealous. She’s not tiptoeing around the tower in a nightie to visit him.

Elizabeth’s nature is highly spiritual – she’s very pious despite her interest in science. The dissection reminds her of a “martyrdom painting,” i.e., religious art, and she sees God in the symmetrical structure of the spinal column. She just came out of a convent to marry William. Young Catholic women were often sent to convents to strengthen their religious education (in England, where Mary Shelley was born, Catholic schools were not legal at certain points in history), and they would someday be guiding their children in the faith. The families paid the convents for boarding them, which helped keep them afloat.

When Victor accuses her of basically wanting to bang his boy, she deflects this very emphatically. She talks about purity of soul, that God may have breathed directly into the flesh Victor animated, etc. During the updated period in which del Toro set the film, twenty years into Queen Victoria’s reign, children were still seen as exploitable resources. It wasn’t until later that childhood began to be revered, and they gained status as people in their own right. Elizabeth, who has already expressed progressive views, is ahead of her time in seeing the innocence and purity of this unusual child.

The Creature looks very newborn and angelic in their previous scene as well – he’s bald, his skin is pale and glowing, and his expression is one of wonder and curiosity. If Elizabeth had lived and had children with William, I think she would have viewed her babies the same way.

It is a love story, but it’s the love of a mother.

Image: Netflix

At her death, Elizabeth tells The Creature (I hate calling him that; his name would be Adam if Victor had even bothered) she realizes that she didn’t belong in the world. She was looking for something more elevated, and she found it with him. Not as a lover, but as pureness of soul, something finer than the earthly. Their connection hinges on seeing that in each other—he is untouched by the world, and to him, she’s just love. She’s the only person who ever treats him kindly until he meets the blind grandfather. It’s selfless like the love of his only friend, a maternal, caring love, and like a mother, she literally gives her life to protect him.

del Toro has been obsessed with this story for decades. There are references throughout the film to both the book and other adaptations. Victor and Elizabeth being a couple (novel) and the dual roles (Elsa Lanchester played Mary Shelley in The Bride of Frankenstein as well as the female creature), The Creature’s long stringy hair (novel) and his oversized, shapeless coat (Charles Ogle as The Creature in Thomas Edison’s 1910 silent film—watch it here), and too many others to mention. And good for you if you spotted that the sleeves of Elizabeth’s wedding dress look like the bandages on Elsa Lanchester’s arms in Bride. A nod is not an interpretation, however, and love is not confined to the romantic sphere.

If you want to read the book, it’s in the public domain. You can download it for free at Project Gutenberg here:  Frankenstein by Mary Wollstonecraft (Godwin) Shelley