Solitude

A comment I made on Jane Friedman’s blog There Are No Rules inspired this post.  Jane’s entry was about inspiration, and contained some quotes she found interesting about how writers can tap into their innermost selves when they are alone.

Tons of people think artists and writers are or should be solitary people, holed up in a studio or an office, painstakingly practicing their art at the point of a brush or the keyboard, with no distractions.  Actually, many writers struggle for those moments because they have so much going on in their personal lives.  Work, family, errands, chores; it’s all demanding.  Most of us don’t have the luxury of writing full-time, especially novelists.

What about the other side of the coin, those who don’t have much of anything?  I’ve known a lot of people who are alone, with no family or few friends.  They tend to bend your ear when you get a chance to talk to them, since at home there’s no one to listen.

I’ve been there.  Truly.  I’ve gone whole weekends without talking to a living soul, either on the phone or face-to-face.  Sometimes the only interaction I have is online.  Many times it’s by choice.  Lots of times, it’s not.  When I’m writing, that can be a blessing.  I’ve tried sneaking work during the day, and there are just too many damn interruptions unless I’m at lunch.

But other times, it sucks.  I’ve gone out and browsed around the flea market not because I want someone’s used dishes, but so I can be around other human beings.  (PS–It’s a great place for writers to eavesdrop on conversations.  Heh heh.)  Right now, I’m living in a place where it’s extremely hard to find like-minded people unless you belong to certain demographics, which I do not.  Judging by a local newspaper article I read a couple of years ago, I’m not the only one here with this perspective.

Writing is a solitary venture.  Even in a house filled with family, when we visit those worlds inside our heads, there’s no one there but us.  Eventually we have to pull ourselves out, if only to seek sustenance or use the bathroom.  That doesn’t mean your life has to be that way.

As I said in my comment, I think solitude is necessary for creativity, but too much isn’t a good thing.  The need for companionship, if not fulfilled, can usurp the good things about solitude and shut you down.  When you need food water won’t do it.  When you need to hear another human voice, forums and even chat rooms are dry bread compared to a steak sandwich. (Why do I try to write blog posts when I’m starving?)

Good writers need that human interaction.  You’re representing life.  Unless your book is set on another planet and your protagonists are all sentient squids, chances are you’re writing about other people.  Go out among them, if only to do field research.  If you’re lucky enough to have a family or live in a situation with housemates, you can mine them for inspiration, bits of dialogue and critiques.  And they will keep you anchored in the world.

For those who are mostly alone, I highly recommend seeking the company of other people on a regular basis.  It will help you recharge.  Church is good if you’re into that, or a group that involves some interest other than writing.  And no, online forums don’t count.  People need to be in the same room with each other.   Have some kind of activity other than your work to engage you.

Maybe you’ll find that your work is better when you isolate yourself.  That may be, but most humans are not meant to be completely solitary creatures.  Find your moments and use them and then get out there.  The reward is richer than you ever imagined.

Is Writing Commercial Fiction a Sell-Out?

Nicola Morgan at Help! I Need a Publisher! inspired this post.  She had an older post about selling out and how it’s more difficult to get published now, because it’s all about sales and not so much writing anymore.

I went back and reread it recently.  Although Nicola is in the UK, her remarks are relevant in the US as well.

Nicola says in the comments, “Definition of commercial – simple: sells a lot. It doesn’t mean bad: it means popular. End of.”  She’s right.  Publishing is a business and these are business decisions.  A lot of writers think of what they do as art.  Many don’t consider commercial fiction art the way we think of it.  Art is Da Vinci, Shakespeare, and the like.

Here’s a wake-up call:  Shakespeare’s plays were commercial fiction.  In Elizabethan times, there were no movies.  People went to the theater.  The nobles got to sit in boxes, but the riff-raff had to stand downstairs.  Still, they went.  Everybody did.

Shakespeare cribbed story elements from other sources, the same way modern filmmakers do.  He mixed them up and presented them to a new audience in an entertaining way.  He invented new words and found common human elements in his stories that resonate with people even today.  That is why his works are classic.  They only seem literary to us because we don’t speak Elizabethan English.

What Shakespeare came up with sold in his time.  Dan Brown, Michael Palmer, Dean Koontz, Stephen King, countless romance authors, etc. are doing well because people buy their books.  This is what we like, people.  Art is subjective.

Writing my first novel (technically my third, but the first I’m actually trying to sell) and having to cut it back so much is teaching me a lot about commercial writing.  So is reading my favorite genre authors.  The next one I’m not even going to bother to flesh out as much.

Why?

  • It doesn’t need it.  I’m learning about making each word count, rather than trying to cover everything.  Show, don’t tell takes more time, but if I’m careful about details, I can show a lot in less space.  A shorter book is easier to sell.  At least that’s what I keep hearing.
  • It takes less time to write it.  If I have to keep working to survive even with books published and royalties coming in (don’t I wish!), I’ll have to make do with little bits of time the way I do now.  The luxury of full-time writing will never be mine unless I join the tiny ranks of million-dollar bestsellers.  Not bloody likely.

It’s not a sellout to choose popular fiction over literary fiction.  I don’t mind cranking them out as long as whatever I produce is entertaining and I’m happy with it.  I never saw popular fiction as a sell-out and I never will. That’s what I like to read, and that’s what I’ll write.  I don’t think I have a literary novel in me, and I like writing fight scenes too much.

In the comments on Nicola’s post, Bacchus replied, “I think it’s only selling out when you can no longer enjoy what your [sic]doing. Giving up your joy in a task is like giving up your very essence.”  She’s right too.   If that happens to you, the work becomes just work.  You’re marking time.

When you find yourself doing that, then it might be time to quit, or at least take a break until you find your joie de vivre again.  If I like the popular stuff and enjoy writing it, my chances are better because I’ll have an audience who already reads whatever it is, and my work will have spirit.

Apparently, then, getting published means find something that will sell, that you want to write, that is universally appealing and that you’re capable of doing justice to.  Not so hard!  We’ll see.

You can’t make it if you don’t try, that’s for sure.  Read posts like Nicola’s and take them for what they are, a gentle reminder to stay realistic in your pursuits.

Why Read It?

Note to Readers:  I’m fast approaching my 100th post, and searching for something special to mark the occasion.  If anyone has anything they’d like to see me do, let me know in comments.  And no, I will not dress up like a bumblebee and sing the Lumberjack Song on video, nor do you want to see me naked.

Why do we read certain things?  What draws us to the type of material we read or write?

Stephen King, in the foreword to his story collection Night Shift, said that our brains have filters in them, and what catches in his filter might not be what gets hung up in that of another writer.  He used the example of standing at the edge of a pond with a famous Western writer and both are struck with an idea.  The Western writer’s might be about water rights in a dry season, while his would probably involve a creature in the pond carrying off animals and finally people.

I think this is true of readers too.  Certain genres attract some and repel others.  I enjoy horror fiction, but I know people who won’t touch it.  And one of my friends in college was an avid romance reader.  I’ve read maybe eight; I would reread three.  Just not my thing.

Perhaps one of the most puzzling genres is crime fiction.  I remember being flabbergasted several years ago to find out that it’s read by mostly women.  And the more violent the better.  Why is that?  We know men like action, car chases and kicking ass in movies. Why do mostly women read crime fiction?

First, more women than men read, especially fiction.  Why? The linked article by Eric Weiner gives some reasons, like girls being more verbal than boys, more in tune with emotions, etc.  More nonfiction is read by men.

Then there’s me; I’m a horror fan who likes David Morrell, Michael Palmer and Preston/Child also.  I read a ton of nonfiction.  And yes, I was born (and happily remain) female.

I never liked the armchair cozy detective stories, the Jessica Fletcher amateur sleuth secret unraveling books.  Films, television—same thing.  I prefer the dark side.  Good thing I’m not a Jedi, isn’t it?  My first novel is a police procedural with high levels of sex and violence.  I like this type of fiction because it’s escapist yet edgy.  It’s as fun to write as it is to read.  I don’t always like the happy ending.

Men are the primary perpetrators of violent crime, especially against women.  I think female readers are drawn to these books because it’s a subject we think about.  The perpetrator is caught, the CSI wraps things up nicely—not always the case in real life.  As potential victims, it’s something we live with every day.

We’re also interested in people.  My criminology classes in college had a large proportion of women in them.  And women are pretty tough about gross things.  We have to be; we’re the ones who clean up the poo, the blood and the puke at home, and break up the fights.  Stands to reason that we can handle a little grue or violence from time to time.

Crime novels are also entertaining. Vicarious badness?  Perhaps.  I know in writing my book, I enjoyed thinking like a bank robber, how I would conceal myself and avoid getting caught.  It was FUN.

Someone who reads romances is often stereotyped as a lonely spinster.  The truth is most readers of this genre are in relationships.  Are they happy ones?  I don’t know.  I like to think so; those with an open heart should be loved as they deserve.  A romantic soul isn’t necessarily a bad thing to have.

Note:  Men, if your lady is like that, you’re lucky.  She’ll always look for the hero in you.  Best appreciate that, or someone else will.  Ladies, don’t dismiss his efforts, even if they’re clumsy.  A regular guy trying to be romantic is better than a chiseled Fabio staring aloof into the distance.  A man who will hold your head while you puke and still think you’re sexy (though not maybe at that particular moment) is worth his weight in platinum.

Regardless of your tastes, you should read or write what appeals to you.  I wrote a book I wanted to write, the way I wanted to write it.  If it never gets published, fine.   Perhaps the next one will.  If my Detective Pierce becomes a series character, maybe I can make him do things we all want to do to the bad people of the world.  Or I can enjoy being them for a while.

What kind of books most appeal to you?  Which ones bore you to tears?  Please share in the comments.

Should fan fiction be legal?

If a writer posts her own UNPUBs online, there isn’t usually an issue.  But what if she creates a new story using someone else’s established characters?

Fan fiction delves into an area where creativity and copyright clash.  Star Trek, Star Wars, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Harry Potter, Batman, it’s all out there.  People are writing new adventures for their favorite characters and posting them for other fans to share.  And they’ve been retelling tales with new twists for centuries.

I have nothing against fan fiction, although it’s not my chosen form of expression.  It wouldn’t surprise me if a lot of artists, in their imitative phase, produced derivative works and never showed them to anyone.  I did only one myself.  Yes, I shared it with a few select individuals.  No, it’s not online and you’ll never see it there.

Personally, it wouldn’t get my nose out of joint if people wrote stories about one of my published characters (if I had any, that is!), as long as they weren’t selling them.  I don’t really want people making money off my creations unless I license them to do so, as in merchandising, etc.  I may be open to that.

The issue gets sticky when fair use considerations rear their heads.  Chillingeffects.org, maintained by Stanford Center for Internet & Society, says “The fair use doctrine says that otherwise copyrighted works may be used for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, or research.

Fan fiction doesn’t fall under this description.  Why?

(Disclaimer:  I am not a lawyer.  For in-depth questions on copyright infringement, please consult a specialized attorney.)

When someone writes fanfic, as it’s commonly referred to, she creates what may be a derivative work using someone else’s established characters.  Under the original copyright, only the holder may have the exclusive right to use or reproduce them in new works.  If anyone else does it, that’s a violation.

Can you steal an idea?  Not really.  Ideas can’t be copyrighted.  They have to be developed in fixed media.  For those who wonder, that does include a computerized manuscript.  It’s not necessary to register your work unless you need to sue someone who stole it.  The very act of fixing it in a tangible form establishes copyright.

Look at all the works on bookstore shelves right now similar to Twilight. A vampire has a relationship with a human?  Buffy did it already.  Did Stephanie Meyer steal from Buffy? No, she took a trope (a common device) and created an original story around it.  So did all the writers who jumped on the Twilight bandwagon.

To make it clearer, let’s try an example.  Mary Sue and Bobby Joe are in a critique group tossing ideas around.  Mary Sue writes a story based on Bobby Joe’s musings about a vampire in love with a werewolf.  Bobby Joe can’t claim this plotline as his own creation because it’s generic.  He can’t stop her from writing her story or even publishing it.

If Bobby Joe publishes a book about the relationship between Fiona the vampire and Colin the werewolf and creates very specific characters, he then has a copyright on those characters.  Mary Sue can’t use them.  She can’t write about Fiona and Colin in a new adventure without violating Bobby Joe’s rights.  She can’t use elements unique to that work and those characters.

However, if Mary Sue were to write a parody of Bobby Joe’s book, similar to the Vampires Suck spoof of the Twilight film, that could constitute fair use and might be allowed.  A critical literary analysis of the Fiona and Colin saga as romantic horror fiction, even with quotes, could also fall under fair use.

What if Mary Sue’s adaptation isn’t published, either online or in print?  It’s still a violation.  I don’t know if Bobby Joe could sue based on this, or if he’d even want to.  If Mary Sue wrote the fanfic for her own pleasure or for no profit, even if someone else reads it, where is the harm?

Individual authors have their own positions about fanfic.  JK Rowling has said she is flattered by it, as long as it remains non-commercial and not obscene.  Conversely, Anne Rice states “I do not allow fan fiction. The characters are copyrighted. It upsets me terribly to even think about fan fiction with my characters. I advise my readers to write your own original stories with your own characters. It is absolutely essential that you respect my wishes.”

There are upsides to fanfic.  It’s certainly a means of tribute to a film, book or television series.  Fan fiction can help a writer practice craft elements like story structure, plotting, and editing without her taking the time to world-build.  Using established characters, she can practice stretching them while still staying true to their personalities.

My fanfic was a great way to get back into the novel form after a long period of mostly academic writing.  And I actually came up with a story I was able to adapt to my own characters.  As a writing exercise it’s useful, although I highly doubt I’ll ever go there again.

Fan fiction writers run other risks with their material.  DC Comics has this statement on their message board policy page:

By posting any fan fiction or proposed story ideas or plots on DC’s Message Boards, you waive any claims for credit or consideration of any kind as a result of DC’s publication or use of any similar matter in any manner or medium.

I am not a lawyer, but that reads as if they are saying “If you post something we like using our original creations, we can take your adaptation idea or even your script/written work and use it without recompense to you.” With this disclaimer, they could hire in-house writers to write your fanfic idea and you get nothing.

Fan fiction can be dangerous territory.  If you get busted for it, penalties are harsh and expensive.  And of course, your reputation could be damaged irreparably.  Perhaps someday authors and fans will reach an acceptable compromise with this issue.  Until then, it seems that fanfic writers will remain closeted and clouded in suspicion.

If you have any thoughts about writing fan fiction, from an author or reader standpoint, please share in the comments.  No personal attacks, please; let’s keep any debate polite and respectful.

Review: The Human Centipede (First Sequence)

Warning: You might want to skip this post if you’re squeamish.

If you learn nothing else from this movie, let it be this:  teach your daughters how to change a tire.

The Human Centipede (First Sequence) has been widely billed as the sickest horror flick ever.  I watched it on DVD last night and to some extent, I have to agree that the idea is indeed pretty darn wacky.  Director Tom Six has spoken at length about his concept; I won’t reproduce it but you can read more here.

Since I did write a post about horror, you may surmise that I’m a fan of the bloodthirsty genre.  I do prefer a good horror novel to a lousy film and there are a great deal of those about.  This one is different.  Even in a glut of torturous gore fests, this movie stands out.  Not because it’s awful, although certain trite elements disappointed me.

The movie opens with a plethora of horror tropes:  a sinister situation as prologue (Mercedes-driving, evil-looking guy kidnapping a trucker who is trying to take a dump), two girls lost in the woods, and the obligatory dark and stormy night.

The ladies, Jenny (Ashlynn Yennie) and Lindsey (Ashley C. Williams) wander around spewing their names at each other so we know who they are, not that it will matter later.  “I think we’re lost, Jenny!”  “Yes, that’s obvious, Lindsey!”  “I’m going back to the car, Jenny!”  “No, we have to get help, Lindsey!”  “The cell phone doesn’t work, Jenny!” et al.  This is virtually all we get to know of these girls, other than they are in Germany and planning to meet a cute guy at a club soirée.

Eventually they make their way to the nearest house, which happens to belong to—ta daah!—the evil-looking guy who clocked the trucker.   He is Dr. Heiter (Dieter Laser), a renowned surgeon who made his fortune separating conjoined twins.  Heiter’s private project involves joining multiple beings at the, um, orifices, so they form one creature, a bizarre centipede.

Yes, you heard me.

He drugs the girls and they wake in a sterile, clinical basement hospital room, in time to see him murder the trucker who isn’t quite right for the ‘pede.  Once he obtains another subject, a Japanese man (Akihiro Kitamura), he coldly explains his procedure to the terrified captives.  He will cut the tendons in their knees so they can’t stand up or extend their legs, thus restricting them to all-fours movement, and then join them ass-to-mouth.  The reaction is predictable.

Laser’s performance is elegantly restrained for such a demented character.  The doctor’s contempt for all humans other than himself is plain, but he doesn’t bellow it or leap around laughing maniacally.  Brief glimpses of anger and stress and his methodical precision produce disquiet in the viewer.  Can this really work?

Six consulted a surgeon for the idea of the centipede, and yes, it can work.  The movie is supposedly 100% medically accurate.  Cue someone trying this in three…two…one….

The clinical atmosphere of Heiter’s basement lab/surgery is scary because it’s so precise and medical.  If it were a filthy dungeon it would be too clichéd.  The music is mostly long sustained tones, more like ambient sounds, lending a sense of hopelessness and terror.

Once the deed is done, bandages swath the creature, hiding the worst of the damage. IMBD trivia states “Some scenes of the movie are so controversial, some people walked out during test screenings.” I admit, I’ve seen so many horror films and documentaries on crime, medical subjects and forensics that it didn’t bother me much.  Most people watching this film are in it for the gross factor.

I felt only the disgust that one would feel for anyone in this situation, but because I didn’t get to know the people, it was nothing more than a lip curl and a tiny bit of pity at first.  If only the girls had learned a bit of car maintenance, perhaps they would have made it to their party.

So it comes as a surprise that as we watch, we actually begin to care about the centipede.  The girls are reduced to wordless sobbing and snuffling, since obviously they can’t talk.  The Japanese man can only speak his native language.  Thanks to copious subtitles, we know the insults he hurls at his captor.   He grows on us.  We begin to like him but his fate is not what we would have hoped.

I couldn’t help thinking how physically tough this film must have been for the actors.  The 68-year-old Laser carries several of his castmates around, the centipede crawls on all fours for the last half of the film and the captives’ emotional breakdowns become exhausting just to watch.

I think hearing too much about this film before I watched it diluted some of the shock value for me.  It didn’t have me on the edge of my seat, except at the very end, and then it was merely tragic.

Overall the film was better than I expected, not as good as I’d hoped.  I wanted something a bit more exciting, but I wasn’t disappointed.   Six has two sequels planned and wants to make each centipede more elaborate than before.  The campy grotesquerie I sought in this movie will undoubtedly show up in the sequel.  I anticipate a repeat of the story in a different setting.  Six can’t add anything really original, however.  He would have been better served to build up to an impressive centipede in a trilogy rather than try to top this with more grue.

See The Human Centipede (First Sequence) if you think you can handle it.  It’s definitely a unique little film.

Interview: Chuck Sambuchino’s How to Survive a Garden Gnome Attack

There’s a new book coming out September 7 that I am dying to read.  The cover looks like this:

I think he's looking at me...

The author is a favorite blogger of mine, Chuck Sambuchino.  He’s been a wealth of information for all us UNPUBs out there.   I found him through Writer’s Digest and never looked back.

Chuck looks like this:

Gnome defense expert and publishing advice giver. Top that, Van Damme!

In his own words:

Chuck Sambuchino is the author of HOW TO SURVIVE A GARDEN GNOME ATTACK, a humor book coming out Sept. 7, 2010.  He is also the editor of GUIDE TO LITERARY AGENTS (2011 edition in stores August 2010) and runs a large blog on publishing: www.guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog.  Besides that, he is a magazine freelancer, playwright, husband, owner of a flabby dog, cover band guitarist, and all around chocolate chip cookie fiend.

Anyone who likes chocolate chip cookies can’t be all bad.  Chuck was gracious enough to grant an interview to this blog.

Tell us about the book.  The cover is hilarious.  It looks like a spoof of the 1976 book Gnomes, by Wil Hugyen and illustrated by Rien Poorvliet.  I loved that as a child.  Is this a gritty reboot?  Were you attacked by a gnome?  Should I rethink buying a gnome statue for my garden?

The cover is a spoof of the old book—good catch.  It’s not a reboot as much as something else entirely.  But yes, I would rethink that gnome purchase if you want to stay alive.

 

Humor writing is not easy for a lot of people.  Funny is very subjective.  Do you have any tips for writers who might like to do this type of work?

Obviously, the concept of the book is key—but there needs to be good content in the book, as well. My editor said it well when she said that people will pick up the book because of the title and cover, but they will only buy it if they flip through some pages and are impressed.  Besides that, I would try to build a platform and network of friends any way you can.  With the big publishing blog I handle (guidetoliteraryagents.com/blog), I have developed a decent platform to reach readers.  It isn’t necessarily a “humor platform,” per se, but it is a platform of some kind.

Your blog contains a great deal of information for new writers.  We thank you profusely for the help you’ve given us. Working in the business yourself, you’ve undoubtedly been well-prepared for publishing your own book, but is there anything that surprised you about the process?

Several small things. For example, a large portion of the original text ended up on the cutting room floor to make room for lots of photos—that part surprised me, but the end result is better for it. A surprising thing for me was how quickly the book came to life.  The publishing industry moves sooooo slow, but this book went from initial discussions with the editor to being published in 10 months, and that’s lightning.  I am very fortunate for that.

Marketing is getting pretty important for writers. Any hints for novelists in particular on their platforms and establishing a presence?

Bribe TV anchors to interview you and get involved in some kind of political scandal.  Besides that: Become involved in writers groups and organizations.  Join a local group, the MWA, the RWA, SCBWI—whatever you like.  And you can always develop a platform that has nothing to do with your writing.  For example, if you start a popular blog on yoga, when you have a novel to sell two years from now, you will have some kind of platform in place to read people who may buy the book.  You need friends who will help you spread the word in their small circles just as you will do for them.

Money is seriously lacking in every industry these days.  Advances are shrinking, editors are being laid off and it’s harder than ever to even get a manuscript past the round file.  Can a fiction writer really make a living anymore?

Well, it’s not likely if all you want to do is sell fiction.  A successful writer needs to wear many different hats—they need to write fiction, teach classes, write articles and freelance edit.  You need to remember that it’s OK to write some things for love and other things for money.  David Morrell, a popular thriller writer, once told me that only 250 people make their living solely from writing fiction.  You have to do other things to pay the bills.  But yes, you can make it work and make a full-time living writing.

What do you see for the future of publishing?

Not sure.  My specialty is helping people get their work published and finding an agent.  As far as the looming transition to e-books and such, I’m already kind of burnt out on people taking wild guesses on all that, and any guess I take would be beyond wild.  (Note to self: Write novel and title it Beyond the Wild.)

Just for fun, what’s the weirdest question / comment you’ve ever come across on your blog?

Following an agent interview, I do remember one comment that was something along the lines of “If this agent can’t sell books, she should model in Playboy because she’s that beautiful.” I think it was about 20 minutes later that the agent frantically e-mailed me to ask me to remove the comment.

Thank you, Chuck!  Everyone, get thee to a bookstore or Amazon and buy this book.  It looks like a hoot.  God knows we all could use a laugh these days!

Tattletale!

Today I was reading Chuck Sambuchino’s blog Guide to Literary Agents and came across this column, part of a series about writers at all stages of their careers sharing their tidbits of wisdom and knowledge.

Lara Ehrlich is as yet unpublished, but her advice rings true.  Check out her blog; it’s kinda neat.

She says not to share your early drafts, rough chapters and first pages.  She says “Get there, then share.”  Awesome.  That should be on a t-shirt, I commented.  She is so right.  I would add ideas to the list.  I agree because:

  • She says you don’t know in the earliest stages of a manuscript how it will turn out. It could be completely different from what you share.  I concur and expand:  early feedback, if positive, could lock you into a path that wouldn’t necessarily serve the story.  You must have the freedom to be flexible without outside influence dictating your narrative.
  • If they like the story, the premise or a character, people will bug you incessantly until you produce it. I made that mistake with my work-in-progress.  Now people I know are asking about it at intervals, making me feel pressured.  It doesn’t help because the story is in a structural tangle and I’m trying to work it out.  It’s my own fault.  I’ll never do that again.  Here’s my opportunity to explore ways to deal with deadline stress.  Always learn something from your stupid mistakes!
  • You can’t copyright ideas. As far as I’m aware, you can’t prevent someone from taking a vague suggestion you elaborated on over a beer, in a chat room / forum or even your critique group and running with it.  The only thing you can sue for is if someone steals your written, fixed and tangible work.  So I could say “I’d like to write a story about a living airplane that eats pollution” and someone could write it, and there’s nothing I can do.  If I actually write the story, published or not, and then someone steals it, there could be trouble.

Feel free to play with that one, if you like.  If you come up with a living airplane story that actually works, send me a link to it.  I’d love to read that!

Writers worry all the time about people stealing their ideas.  Although I haven’t seen it, there was even a kid’s movie about this, Big Fat Liar, with Frankie Muniz, Paul Giamatti and Amanda Bynes, where a smarmy Hollywood producer steals a brilliant homework assignment from an incorrigible kid.

Despite the movie, most of the time you don’t have to worry about this.  Reputable agents and publishers know that they won’t be in business long if they go around swiping every unpublished manuscript that isn’t screwed to the brick wall of copyright registration.  Under the law, once it’s in a tangible form, it’s yours.  If you want to sue, you’d have to register it formally, but that’s usually taken care of by your publisher if you’re fortunate enough to land one.  If you back up digital work regularly it’s easy to show when a file was created.

Just don’t talk about your embryonic nuggets of literary gold, and no one can take them from you.  Keep your big mouth shut.

Don’t share those first attempts, either, as Lara advises.  No one can implode your ethereal house of cards if they don’t see it.  Keep it close until it’s strong enough to withstand a poke or two.   Sometimes it’s better just to walk away, but a truly good story may be lost if the writer folds because of an early question or criticism.

Got any advice about sharing/not sharing?  Please post in the comments.

Remake Rants

I have a couple of questions for Hollywood.

What happened to original material?  And how about you read a good book once in a while?  Then you’ll know what makes a story.

What’s with all the remakes?  I mean, come on.  Movies that don’t need to be remade, rebooted, and reimagined are coming out in droves.  Television shows, some really terrible, get the full treatment.  Even Avatar, which should have been a triumph, was pretty but had a story so full of tropes it was totally predictable.  Boo!

I get it; it’s about money, guaranteed sales, etc.  Stop playing it safe, Hollywood.  Chris Nolan took a chance on rebooting Batman, and it was worth it.  A very original take on familiar material.  Batman is a pretty good draw, although no amount of money will make me watch Batman Forever or Batman and Robin.  I don’t care if George Clooney comes to my house naked and begs me to watch with him.

The worst part of this trend is younger people who don’t remember the originals are stuck with the lousy remakes.  And just try to get some of them to watch.  Next time some kid says “Old movies are boring” I’m gonna slap him silly.  Now get off my lawn!

As a rule I tend to boycott remakes, especially of classic films that don’t suffer from having been made before CGI, or 3D or any other acronym of special effects wonderment.

Here’s a list of a few films that should probably have been left alone:

  • The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951). Really?  DTESS is a classic of science fiction starring Michael Rennie and Patricia Neal.  The political stuff alone makes it worth watching.  The world’s reaction to the saucer, and the shooting of Klaatu the moment he steps out of it don’t lose a thing with time.  Neither does Bernard Herrmann’s scary theramin music.  It’s hard to believe this film was made fifty-nine years ago.
  • The Omen (1976). Hands up if you saw this scary evil kid film when it came out or on TV.   If not, you missed something.  Gregory Peck, David Warner and the lovely and incomparable Lee Remick are outstanding in this tale of a diplomat’s son who is also the Anti-Christ.  It’s Gregory Peck, people!  David Warner will be familiar to anyone who saw Titanic; he played Rose’s boyfriend’s evil minion Lovejoy.  Two decent sequels followed.  The film’s composer, Jerry Goldsmith, won the Oscar for Best Original Score.   Who was in the remake?  Anybody remember?  Hmmm?  I didn’t THINK so!

  • The Haunting (1963). Directed by Robert Wise and starring Julie Harris, Claire Bloom and Russ Tamblyn of West Side Story (yes, he’s Amber Tamblyn’s father), this creepy movie was adapted from Shirley Jackson’s novel of the same name.   It’s the scariest haunted house movie ever.  In one scene, the characters wake late at night to a terrifying pounding noise out in the hall, moving down toward the door, which bulges inward in an impossible way.  You don’t see a thing here, but what you think might be on the other side will give you nightmares.  The only palatable thing about the remake was Catherine Zeta-Jones, who is always good even in crap.  I hope they paid her well.

  • Clash of the Titans (1981). Again with the CGI, this time also adding 3D.  The 1981 film starred Harry Hamlin, Burgess Meredith, Maggie Smith (Professor McGonagall!), Claire Bloom (again), and Laurence Olivier as Zeus.  Top that!   Famous stop-motion special effects guru Ray Harryhausen did the creatures.  The original was campy and fun; according to reports, the remake had nothing going for it.  They even showed the Kraken in the trailer; way to spoil the climax of the film before anyone even saw it!  I still might watch it on DVD, but I’m glad I didn’t pay theater prices to see it.  Sam Worthington starred, fresh off Avatar, where he was pretty good despite the weak material.

SSTers, please enjoy a hilarious spoof / review here by leviathan12.


  • Poltergeist (1982). This one is just a rumor, but please, please, don’t.  Just don’t.  Forget the curse; there isn’t one.  Just don’t do it.  You can’t make it scarier than the original and I know you, Hollywood.  You’ll just go too far and bore us to death.  Too much CGI doesn’t work any better than none.  Countless people who saw this one when it came out remember it as one of the scariest films they ever watched.

A couple of exceptions to the “remakes suck” rule are worth mentioning.

  • The Thing (1982). Duuuuude.  If you haven’t seen this, rent it immediately, but don’t watch it alone.  It’s one of the few horror movies that can actually creep me out.  I’m totally jaded, but this got me in a way I can’t even explain.  The original Howard Hawks film from 1951, The Thing from Another World, is based on a novella by John W. Campbell, Jr. called Who Goes There? You can read it online here.  It’s a pretty good film—James Arness of Gunsmoke plays the Thing—but this one is better.  Ennio Morricone, great Italian soundtrack master who scored such films as The Untouchables and The Good, The Bad and the Ugly, wrote some of the scariest music imaginable for this film.  It stars Wilford Brimley, Kurt Russell, Keith David, and Richard Dysart.

  • Little Shop of Horrors (1986). A campy musical adaptation of a 1960 Roger Corman vehicle, this is a delight.  It was originally done off-Broadway.  The songs are great, the story is fun and the actors enjoyed themselves hugely.  I’ve seen the original; it was Jack Nicholson’s first credited film appearance (he played the masochistic dental patient) and was hysterically funny.   Apparently, the musical had a much blacker ending than the film and they changed it, but this one is good too.  Rick Moranis, Ellen Green (who played Audrey in the stage version) and Steve Martin as the dentist star.

Both these films are a good example of doing something fresh with the original material.  We need more original screenplays or works adapted that are new to the screen.  Watchmen may have been flawed, but it was damned enjoyable.  They tried, by God.  They got good actors and really gave it a go.  Comic and other genre movies are getting a good trial right now.  If you treat the material seriously you’ve got a winner, not just from established fans but the new ones.  Look at The Dark Knight; Heath Ledger won an Oscar not because he died, but because he took an iconic character and made something out of it that was more than a cartoon.

Take The Lord of the RingsReturn of the King won Best Picture.  Let me reiterate:  a fantasy film won Best Picture.  Geeks everywhere creamed their jeans over that one.  Yes, it had loads of CGI and couldn’t have been done as well without it, but talk about using it responsibly.  Hell, yeah.  Thank you, Peter Jackson, for creating such a masterful adaptation and opening the door to a whole new world of filmmaking.  There are a ton of books out there that would make great movies, some fantasy, some not.

Grow a pair, Hollywood.   Audiences are more sophisticated than they were.  People are tired of CGI; it can’t carry a film if there’s no story, and the same is true for 3D.  Tim Burton’s Alice in Wonderland was good but didn’t need the 3D.  Avatar did because the story was so weak.  Audiences, do your part by not paying to see lousy remakes of good films, or crappy TV shows.  Let’s raise the standards of our entertainment by demanding quality content.

Got any good remakes you’d like to suggest?  Please share in the comments.

Music of the Hemispheres

A recent post by Arlee Bird at tossing it out inspired me today.  I was trying to get caught up on my blog reading, and came across this post regarding the necessity of music programs in schools.  Take a minute to read if you like.

My reaction was to post this comment:

Education in the arts is important for cultural development. Not only does it expose students to the richness and diversity of their own culture, but music is a fantastic way to expose them to others as well. I belong to a music website where all the people come together to enjoy soundtracks, and a ton of them live halfway around the world. Yet we all have this in common, and we have become friends. We don’t need anything more to divide us; it’s a global community. Keep art and music education. Support it and fight for it.

Disclaimer: I don’t have any children but if I did, they WOULD have this. I would see to it. If the school couldn’t provide it, I would. It’s too important.

I’m a bit biased, being musical myself.  My mother plays the piano like a virtuoso and I grew up listening to Chopin, Grieg, Beethoven (my favorite) and a ton of other classical pieces.  I took piano lessons myself.   Sadly that seems to be something I’m destined never to master.  I studied vocal performance in college, although I didn’t graduate, since I minored in partying.  Ha!

I remember taking music classes in grade school.  It was required.  Our teacher held a talent show every year and under her iron rule, only her pets were chosen to perform.  I wasn’t one of them and was never picked.  But I loved music class despite her obvious contempt for me.  It was one place I excelled.  We listened to and played/sang all kinds of music, from classical to folk tunes from other lands.  I continued with choir in high school and college.  Some of my best memories from then are from choir performances at other schools and music contests.

We had exposure to rhythm and theory, all of which are good for developing brains.  Here is an article from the Harvard Gazette that, while kind of old, backs me up.  And from a 2007 article about a Stanford University study, “Music engages the brain over a period of time…and the process of listening to music could be a way that the brain sharpens its ability to anticipate events and sustain attention.”

What does music do for you?  I’m listening to my soundtrack channel right now.  It’s helping me think.  At the moment, an amazing piece by Serge Prokofiev is playing.  Classical finds its way into soundtracks, you know.  Platoon had Barbers Adagio for Strings, 10 had Ravel’s Bolero, and the list goes on.

When I listen, my body relaxes, my brain unwinds and my blood pressure surely drops.  I have a day job that has been slowly becoming more stressful over time.  When I come home, I listen to my music and chat with my online friends and I feel the day fall away from me.

It helps me concentrate while I write and evokes emotions that find their way into my prose.   I wrote the entire first draft of Rose’s Hostage while listening to the soundtrack of Black Hawk Down.  I have not seen that movie and now I don’t want to, because certain segments of the music are indelibly impressed on scenes from my book.  I also like to create playlists that mirror my characters; it helps me understand the workings of their minds.  It’s like that old game, “Boxers or Briefs?” where you guess what kind of underpants someone would wear.  What kind of music would this person like?  Why?  What does he/she hate and why?

How does music inspire you or enrich your life and art?  Do you have memories from school of music ed?  Please share in the comments.

Courage, the Lion said

The definition of the word escapes us.  We think bravery and courage are the warrior, cop or firefighter charging in, kicking ass and taking names, leaping into action at the slightest hint of danger, to serve, save and protect.

In truth, courage doesn’t mean fearless.  Courage is what we show when we are afraid but we do it anyway.

Courage in daily life can be large, as in pulling someone from burning wreckage, or small, when you make an effort to smile at a coworker instead of snapping on a hellish day.  Courage is standing up for your beliefs, even if it makes you unpopular.  It’s saying “I don’t like what you said” when someone makes a remark you find offensive.  It’s apologizing when you do that yourself, and admitting you made a mistake.

Writers have to have courage to start their careers.  Countless writers never send in their work, or even show it to anyone because they are afraid.  They make up excuses not to do so, and sometimes they even write secretly to avoid the questions.  It’s perfectly okay to do it for yourself if that’s what makes you happy.  But if you have any intention of being published, then you must take yourself in hand and do what you can to improve your work, and put it out there.  You have to, because no one ever published a trunk novel that stayed in the trunk.  I must say, I’ve read a lot of novels that should have stayed in the trunk!

I talked to someone recently who writes and shows it to no one but her husband.  He thinks she’s great.  She has the fear greeblies, however, and some of them look like the following.  To her and others who may be on the fence, here are my recommendations:

  • It’s not edited. Some people think they need a professional editor to work on their material.  That’s an option but it’s an expensive one, if you want to hire someone good.  Learning to edit is part of your craft and there are numerous books out there that can help you.  Do your research and acquire this valuable skill.  You don’t need to pay anyone; you can (and should) polish your own work.

Check out Self Editing for Fiction Writers by Renni Brown and Dave King and Write Tight by William Brohaugh.  I noticed you can get a used copy of the first one for $1.23.  Even I can afford that, and I’m flat broke right now.  These books are a good start.

Eventually, you may join a writer’s group and put your work out there for critiquing.  There are writers’ forums online if you can’t find a group in your area.  Scary, but necessary.  A good group will help you grow and can point out things you don’t see, in a nonconfrontational manner.

  • I don’t know anything about publishing. Again, there are tons of source material out there.  I have recommended several websites in other posts.  Google it; no one is keeping this information from you.

  • I don’t know anything about marketing. Well, neither do I, but I’m trying to learn.  You don’t need a degree in it to build a platform for your writing career and again, there are tons of helps.  How to Get Happily Published by Judith Applebaum has a great deal of marketing information for writers.  I actually had to buy this for a class and hung on to it.

  • I sent out a query and no one replied / they said no / I got a form letter. Yes, this happens.  You can learn how to do this too.  Even a great query might not sell your book.  Maybe it’s not the right time for that book, or maybe it’s not the right book for you.  Go on to the next one and try again.

Most of the fear comes from ignorance.  The more you learn, the more confident you’ll become. Fear can’t control you if you know how to handle it.  Things aren’t as scary if you know what to do.  That’s why people are urged to practice disaster preparedness.  And it applies to any situation, not just writing.

If there was a time when you managed to do something despite your fear, please share your tale of courage with us in the comments.