Hey Hollywood, Here’s How to Remake a Film!

Certain Someone and I recently watched the terrific remake of True Grit, a classic Western that starred John Wayne as Rooster Cogburn, a washed-up alcoholic marshal engaged by Mattie Ross (Kim Darby) to find Tom Cheney (Jeff Corey), her father’s killer.

Jeff Bridges played Rooster this time around, with Josh Brolin as Cheney.  Hailee Steinfeld was Mattie and Matt Damon played LeBeouf, a Texas Ranger also seeking their quarry (Glen Campbell in the original).

There are several elements to a successful remake that make it worth watching.  This one had them all.

A good story

True Grit has a fantastic hook for a Western –the young girl seeking her father’s killer with the grizzled lawman– and there’s plenty of action to keep a viewer engaged.  It’s also an effective character piece.  The internal conflicts provide motivation.  You can have action by itself, but it’s not going to grab you in the gut unless you care about the people and why they are doing this.

Good writing

You can have the best story in the world and screw it up with bad writing.  Example:  the film Red Dragon, one of my favorite books ever, by Thomas Harris (and if you’ve never read Harris, get your butt to the library now).  Technically, it’s a stand-alone film, but the story was already done by Michael Mann in the 80s, as Manhunter.

Bear with me here, because I need to explain this.

Both films have flaws, but Manhunter is at least watchable, if slick.  Red Dragon was re-written so poorly it made my head hurt.  They both used dialogue from the book and in one scene in both movies, the same bit was used.  I’ll paraphrase here:

Manhunter: Feds Graham (William Peterson—yeaaaah!) and Crawford are privately discussing the Tooth Fairy serial killer.

Graham: “He won’t stop.”

Crawford: “Why not?”

Graham: “Because he’s got a genuine taste for it.”

A Harris original; a straightforward, chilling line.  It tells us much about the Tooth Fairy and Graham also, since he’s best known for his ability to step inside the mind of the monster.  Good choice to keep it in.

Now Red Dragon: Same bit, but transplanted to a police briefing.  Press might have been there too.  I don’t remember.

Graham (Ed Norton this time—meh):  “He won’t stop.”

Some dumb girl in the front row:  “Why not?”

Graham (turns head dramatically):  “BECAUSE HE THINKS HE’S GAAAAAAWWWD.”


I nearly fled the theater.  The only reason I didn’t was Ralph Fiennes as Francis Dolarhyde, aka the Tooth Fairy (Tom Noonan in Manhunter).  Fiennes, as all Harry Potter fans know, plays the greatest villains.

Another mistake was taking dialogue and scenes between the Crawford and Graham characters and rearranging them so they now involved Graham and Hannibal Lecter, who has a very small part in the original book and the Mann film.

It was an unsubtle attempt to get more screen time for Anthony Hopkins’ popular version of Lecter (Brian Cox played him in Manhunter). And the conversations between these two did not ring true to either a real life scenario or the characters themselves.

Overall, Red Dragon kept certain entertaining background elements of the book that Manhunter chose to scrap, but it ran like a Chevette traveling a road full of potholes. It would go, and then CLUNK! And go, and then CLUNK!  I still smoked then and spent most of the movie wishing for a cigarette, a sign of extreme boredom.

A good cast

Back to True Grit.  Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon and Josh Brolin are all good actors.  They know how to give life to their characters.  An iconic performance like Wayne’s is tough for a contemporary actor to overcome.  You need someone who has the ability to play the character his or her own way and still be true to the original.  And they need solid supporting actors.  Hailee Steinfeld shows promise—she was awesome.

Making a remake, not a reboot

Nowhere in this movie did I see any updating.  There was no massive CGI, no snarky modern dialogue from characters dressed in Victorian garb, and no slow motion Matrix-style fighting (can we move on from that already?).

I’ve only seen bits of the original—it always seems to be on when I can’t watch it.  But I’ve heard from people who prefer Wayne that they were at least happy with the newer film.

Since Hollywood is remaking so many classic films (and some not so classic ones), you’d think they would learn some of these things.  I will still exhort them—vigorously—to seek new and original material.  There are plenty of novels that would make terrific films.  If they read a book once in a while, I’d probably go to the movies more often.

Is there a remake out there you like?  Or do you know a book that you’d like to see made into a film?  Feel free to share in the comments.


5 thoughts on “Hey Hollywood, Here’s How to Remake a Film!

  1. I loved the new version of True Grit! And I’m a John Wayne fan from way back, (though not so much a Kim Darby fan.) The new version was everything you said it was; a solid retelling of the story that can stand on its own two feet.

  2. The Coen brothers always deliver good films. I’ve heard that their version of True Grit is more true to the book than the Wayne version. I haven’t seen either yet, but the new version is on my Netflix queue.

    Remakes? The original War of the Worlds is a classic that is near perfect in it’s own right, but I thought the remake with Tom Cruise added a new dimension and was outstanding.

    Books into movies? I was glad that McCarthy’s All the Pretty Horses was attempted, even though not loved by critics or the public, but I would like to see the next two novels of The Border Trilogy put to film.

    Tossing It Out

    • Yeah, they do. Blood Simple is a fave.

      I liked War of the Worlds a lot. Tom Cruise really can act, he just doesn’t because the star vehicles an A-lister is given don’t require it.

  3. I would rather have my toe nails yanked out with pliers than watch a John Wayne movie, sorry just not a fan. Ahem anyway, so I can not speak to True Grit. However I can speak to remakes and also add prequels, as if sequels were not bad enough. Is there anything more pointless than a prequel? it is not like we do not know the ending.

    Remakes are just a wash. the lazy and idea bankrupt in Hollywood trying to rake in some cash on another idea. I will take all of yours word on True Grit but it seems to be an outstanding anomaly. can any of us say that many other remakes have been any good? But it comes down to a recent philosophy of mine. regarding remakes, sequels, prequels etc.

    Hollywood can make whatever the hell they want, but I am in control over what I spend my money on to watch.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.